9. Didn't Jesus replace the Ten Commandments with just one new one in John 15:12?
11. Didn't Jesus himself break the Sabbath in John 5:18?
13. Why keep the Sabbath, but not the festivals of Israel or other parts of the Law of Moses
8. Doesn't Romans 14:5 say each man is free to keep whatever day he wants, whether Sabbath or Sunday or another day?
Neither Sabbath nor the first day of the week is mentioned in this passage. Since the verse is sandwiched between verses dealing with the issue of vegetarianism (v.1-3 and v. 6f.), probably some believers esteemed certain days as "better" (v. 5) in the sense of being dedicated to the eating of vegetables only (meat being considered by them, "unclean," v. 14, on such days). This may have been in connection with contemporary Jewish observance of days of fasting (when some Jews abstained from both meat and wine; cf. v. 21). Paul treated such observances as a matter of different "opinions" (v. 1) upon which judgment was not to be passed, while he also stated the overall principle in Rom. 14:17 that, "the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit." The 4th Commandment was never a matter of eating and drinking. It is not in view in this chapter. Back to Top
9. Didn't Jesus replace the Ten Commandments with just one new one in John 15:12?
Even if that were true (which it is not), 1 John 5:2-3 reminds us that loving God's children means loving God, means obeying what God commandments. Back to Top
10. What about 1 John 3:23? Doesn't it say Jesus' commandments today are only to believe in Christ and love one another?
Taking that verse to be exclusive (i.e., to mean that all Jesus requires of believers is to believe in him and love one another) would be making Jesus say we should ignore what he himself identifies in Matt. 22:37-38 as the "great and first commandment": "You shall love the Lord your God." Obviously the words in 1 Jn. 3:23 mean something like, "This is one of the commandments I'm giving you," not, "This is/these are all the commandments I'm giving you." Back to Top
11. Didn't Jesus himself break the Sabbath in John 5:18?
This verse merely states the opinion of the Scribes and Pharisees, who were angry with Jesus because he had healed a man on the Sabbath. Jesus had not broken God's Sabbath. He had broken theirs. (In Matt. 12:2 they accused Jesus' disciples of breaking the Sabbath because they had picked some heads of grain to eat. Again, this was breaking their rules for the Sabbath, not God's. Jesus said they were condemning "the guiltless," v. 7.) Back to Top
12. How does law-keeping square with the NT emphasis on Grace? And aren't Jesus' commands "higher" than the Ten Commandments?
Salvation is by
Grace, but discipleship is a matter of obedience. The NT emphasizes
discipleship, and sanctification and obedience--as well as salvation.
Shall we not obey God, who loves us, and Christ, who died for us? It
comes down to what Jesus said: "If you love me, you will keep my
commandments" (John 14:15, and see v. 21). Chief among Jesus'
commandments were the two upon which depend "all the Law and the Prophets" (the entire OT)[2]
in terms of the love they require for God and one's neighbor (Matt.
22:34-40). Love for one's neighbor "sums up" the last six of the Ten
Commandments (Rom. 13:8-10), just as love for God sums up the first
four.[3]
So if we love Jesus, we will obey the Ten Commandments in the spirit in
which Jesus summarized them--including the 4th Commandment to, "remember
the Sabbath day, to keep it holy" (Ex. 20:8).
Jesus' commands are therefore not in opposition to the Ten
Commandments. They provide a basis for summarizing the Ten in terms of
the deeper heart-motivation which the New Covenant enables believers to
show in keeping them. A summary does not contradict what it summarizes,
and neither does Jesus' command to love God contradict those first four
Commandments by which love for God is to be shown. To set the Son's
commands against the Father's is to reject the direct teaching of Jesus,
who said, "If anyone loves me, he will keep my word... The word that you
hear is not mine but the Father’s who sent me" (Jn. 14:23-24). Back to Top
13. Why keep the
Sabbath, but not the festivals of Israel or other parts of the Law of
Moses? (Also see answers to questions #6 and #7, above.) Believers today do not need to participate any longer in these rituals
(Heb. 10:1; Gal. 4:10-11). In Christ's sacrifice, the Passover lamb was offered
once and for all time (1 Cor. 5:7, 1 Pet. 1:18-19), and a blood better than that
of the bull and goat of the Day of Atonement was shed, ending the need for such
sacrifices to ever be made again (Heb. 9:11-14, 24-26; Heb. 10:18). The
ceremonial provisions of the law accompanying these have also ceased to be
necessary. Their gifts and sacrifices, "deal only with food and drink
and various washings, regulations for the body imposed until the time of
reformation" (Heb. 9:10). Believers today owe no obligation to such
regulations, which are set aside (like the priesthood of Melchizedek) because of
their "weakness and uselessness" (Heb. 7:18). We relate to God under the new
covenant in Christ. "In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one
obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish
away." (Heb. 8:13). The ministry of Christ as High Priest and mediator of a new
covenant marks a change in the Law ("For when there is a change in the
priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well," Heb.
7:12). The results can be seen in such places as Mark 7:19,
Acts 15:10-11, 2 Cor. 3:7-17, Gal. 4:8-11 and Gal. 5:2-4. The Sabbath,
however, was not changed (except that the Temple offerings, which it
temporarily shared with new moons and feast days, were made no longer
necessary --Col. 2:16). In this sense, the Sabbath is no more Jewish
than monogamous marriage (Gen. 2:18, 24) or belief in one God.
[2] In Matt. 22:40
Jesus is using the two commands from the OT Law as a means of
summarizing the proper motivation for observing all of it--indeed,
for observing all that the OT as a whole teaches.
[3] Paul applies
Jesus' teaching specifically to the Ten Commandments, saying
Commandments 5-10 (which deal with behavior toward others) are
"summed up" by the command to "love your neighbor as yourself."
Correspondingly, it is fitting to understand Commandments 1-4
(which deal with behavior toward God) as summed up by the command to
"love the Lord your God."
In neither case is the intention to replace the specific
commands of the Law with generalized exhortations to love God or
others. Paul's
characterization of Commandments 5-10 as "summed up" by the command
to "love your neighbor" implies a kind of specificity for the latter
command in the former ones, not a replacement of the former by the
latter.
[4] So a law like
that in Lev. 19:19 ("Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of
material") involves no action that is wrong in and of itself, but rather
with an action to which symbolic meaning has been given.
But laws like those in Lev. 19:11 ("Do not steal.
Do not lie. Do not deceive one another") involve actions that
are, by nature, wrong. Laws
of clean and unclean food also involve no actions that are wrong (in the
sense of "inherently sinful") in themselves.
Otherwise these laws would not have been revoked by Jesus (Mark
7:19).